Weakley v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs Weakley, Mandel and Pohrer have appealed from the decree of the circuit court finding the issues against them in their suit against the state highway commission to quiet title to two narrow strips of land adjoining Utz Lane and U. S. Highway 66 in St. Louis County. The court decreed that the state, acting by and through the state highway commission, has an easement for highway purposes and the right to use, possess and control these strips, and dismissed plaintiffs’ petition.
Utz Lane and Highway 66 intersect in an unincorporated area of St. Louis County. Utz…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. . RodawaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Byam v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Creekmore v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- City of Laddonia v. DaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Hall v. BreyfogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Prewitt v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Pullin v. VictorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Village of Climax Springs v. CampMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Public Water Supply District No. 2Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.