Legal Opinion

Matomco Oil Co. v. Arctic Mechanical, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1990No. S-2773PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

OPINION

I. INTRODUCTION.

Matomco appeals the superior court’s judgment, based on a general jury verdict, in favor of Arctic Mechanical, Inc., George Wise, Alliance Insurance Company, and Underwriters at Lloyds. Matomco had employed an independent contractor (David Campbell) to repair Matomco’s fuel tanker. During the repair the tanker exploded, killing David Campbell and causing appellees’ damages. Appellees sued both Campbell’s estate and Matomco, but settled with the estate before trial. At trial, appellees claimed that Matomco was liable on multiple theories of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Siegler v. KuhlmanWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Aschoff v. Mobil Oil Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Veco, Inc. v. RosebrockAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. General Motors Corp. v. FarnsworthAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Donald CHAFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Martin Marietta Services, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Saddler v. Alaska Marine Lines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API