General Motors Corp. v. Farnsworth
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
After experiencing near fatal injuries in a car accident, Kimberly Farnsworth sued General Motors (GM) in strict liability for designing a defective seat restraint system. Following a fiveweek trial, the jury returned a verdict for Farnsworth, awarding her $2,138,973 in compensatory damages and $5,600,000 in punitive damages. The superi- or court denied GM’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial, and GM appeals. We conclude that the superior court erred in rejecting a comparative negligence instruction and refusing to require the jury…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Jackson v. General Motors Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.