Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Farnsworth

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1998No. S-7700PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After experiencing near fatal injuries in a car accident, Kimberly Farnsworth sued General Motors (GM) in strict liability for designing a defective seat restraint system. Following a fiveweek trial, the jury returned a verdict for Farnsworth, awarding her $2,138,973 in compensatory damages and $5,600,000 in punitive damages. The superi- or court denied GM’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial, and GM appeals. We conclude that the superior court erred in rejecting a comparative negligence instruction and refusing to require the jury…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Jackson v. General Motors Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API