Legal Opinion

Saddler v. Alaska Marine Lines, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1993No. S-5235PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Donald Saddler and Anthony Washington, employees of Knik Construction, Inc. (Knik), were injured when a tank they were heating exploded. The tank contained one type of asphalt paving material; they mistakenly believed it contained another. They sued Alaska Marine Lines (AML), the common carrier who had pumped both materials into different empty tanks, on sever al theories. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of AML on all claims. Saddler and Washington appealed the grant of summary judgment on two claims: strict produets liability and negligence.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Swenson Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Truckweld Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wassink v. HawkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Burnett v. CovellAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Maddox v. River & Sea Marine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Palmer G. Lewis Co. v. ARCO Chemical Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API