Legal Opinion

Donald CHAFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Martin Marietta Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1999No. 97-35688PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit judge:

Donald Chaffin was badly mauled and disfigured when a polar bear burst through a window of the living quarters of a remote Alaskan Long Range Radar System (“LRRS”) site. Chaffin, at the time, was an employee of a contractor, but the site was owned by the United States Air Force. Chaffin sued the United States for negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. The district court ruled that the government was immune from any liability for the design of the living quarters because the design fell within the discretionary function…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kenneth Richardson Norman J. Trapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Terbush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hendrickson v. eBay, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
  3. Campanelli v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
  4. Image Online Design, Inc. v. Core Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  5. Campanelli v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API