Ames v. City of Hermosa Beach
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IRWIN, J. *
This is an. appeal in an action seeking a declaration that certain loitering and housing laws of the City of Hermosa Beach are unconstitutional on their face and are therefore void. Appellant, a taxpayer, brought this action pursuant to section 526a of the Code of Civil Procedure to enjoin respondents from expending public funds and from using public property for the purpose of administering or enforcing certain provisions of its Municipal Code, to wit, (1) sections 20-10 and 20-11, relating to loitering, 1 and (2) section 18-14, regulating the rental of housing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harrigfeld v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District Ex Rel. County of FreemontIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Schmidt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kortum v. AlkireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. McKelvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bayes v. Nancy C.California Court of Appeal · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.