Legal Opinion

Ames v. City of Hermosa Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1971No. Civ. 34817PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IRWIN, J. *

This is an. appeal in an action seeking a declaration that certain loitering and housing laws of the City of Hermosa Beach are unconstitutional on their face and are therefore void. Appellant, a taxpayer, brought this action pursuant to section 526a of the Code of Civil Procedure to enjoin respondents from expending public funds and from using public property for the purpose of administering or enforcing certain provisions of its Municipal Code, to wit, (1) sections 20-10 and 20-11, relating to loitering, 1 and (2) section 18-14, regulating the rental of housing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harrigfeld v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District Ex Rel. County of FreemontIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Schmidt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kortum v. AlkireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. McKelvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Bayes v. Nancy C.California Court of Appeal · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API