Schmidt v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*373Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.*
In this case we must determine the validity, under California law, of a private mobilehome park rule limiting residence in the park to persons 25 years or older. The trial court found the rule valid, but the Court of Appeal disagreed, concluding that Civil Code section 798.76 barred a private mobilehome park owner from adopting or enforcing such a rule. 1 The Court of Appeal’s interpretation of section 798.76, however, conflicted with the interpretation of the statute in another appellate court decision,2 and we granted review to resolve the conflict.
In September 1988,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Loder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.