Waldo v. . Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at September Term, .1918, of' Gkaiiam. Tbis is an appeal from an order taxing the defendant with the entire cost of copying the transcript on the plaintiffs’ appeal to the Supreme-Court, 173 N. C., 690; S. c., 174 N. C., 767.
1Opinion of the CourtOlabk, C. J.
There was a motion in this cause, Waldo v. Wilson, 174 N. C., 767, to retax the costs by allowing the plaintiffs to recover the entire costs of printing the record (238 pages) notwithstanding the general rule confined the allowance of costs for printing to sixty pages of printed matter. Rule 31, 174 N. C., 836. This was denied upon the ground as therein stated, that “A large part of the record as printed' related to a matter upon which the appellant failed to establish his contentions, although he secured a new trial.”
In the Superior Court, when the case went back, the plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . HorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Costin v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846
- Guilford v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Dobson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Roberts v. . LewaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Dalenko v. Wake County Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Mintz v. . FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Dalenko v. WAKE COUNTY DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Janicek v. HinnenColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.