Legal Opinion

Mintz v. . Frink

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1940PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The questions involved on this appeal are these:(1) Is service of summons on Sunday valid? (2) Does marking an original summons “alias” constitute it an alias summons? (3) When summons has been served on defendant on Sunday and when alias summons has not been issued within the time limited by statute, is defendant, by motion made on special appearance, entitled to have .the action dismissed for want of jurisdiction of person? (4) When defendant enters an appearance, designated special, and moves to dismiss the action not only for invalid service of summons, that is, want of jurisdiction of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Neely v. . MinusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. McGuire v. Montvale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Kingsley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Staley v. HerefordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Narron v. Union Camp Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Lackey v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Morton v. Blue Ridge Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Cherry v. WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API