Legal Opinion

Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 2000No. 582PA99PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEMAN, Justice.

This is a class action lawsuit brought by named plaintiffs to recover a $158.50 fee charged by the Mazda dealership when plaintiffs exercised their option to buy their leased vehicle. Plaintiffs’ lease agreement with the dealer (on a “Mazda American Credit” form) failed to disclose that any such fee would be charged in addition to the purchase-option price stated in the agreement. 1 The fee nevertheless appeared in a space designated “DEL. & HDLG.” on the dealer’s “Retail Buyer[’]s Order and Invoice” executed by plaintiffs when they purchased the vehicle.

On 27 March 1998,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Azure Dolphin, LLC v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Ehrenhaus v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API