Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FREEMAN, Justice.
This is a class action lawsuit brought by named plaintiffs to recover a $158.50 fee charged by the Mazda dealership when plaintiffs exercised their option to buy their leased vehicle. Plaintiffs’ lease agreement with the dealer (on a “Mazda American Credit” form) failed to disclose that any such fee would be charged in addition to the purchase-option price stated in the agreement. 1 The fee nevertheless appeared in a space designated “DEL. & HDLG.” on the dealer’s “Retail Buyer[’]s Order and Invoice” executed by plaintiffs when they purchased the vehicle.
On 27 March 1998,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Azure Dolphin, LLC v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Ehrenhaus v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.