Legal Opinion

Janicek v. Hinnen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1974No. 73-148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

522 P.2d 113 (1974)

A. Therese JANICEK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Gay M. HINNEN and Donald J. Hinnen, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 73-148.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

May 7, 1974.

Clark, Martin & Pringle, James A. Clark, Denver, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Bruce & Sandblom, James M. Bruce, Denver, for defendants-appellants.

Selected for Official Publication.

ENOCH, Judge.

Gay and Donald Hinnen, defendants, appeal from a post-judgment order of the trial court which assessed them $332 for plaintiffs' costs. We reverse.

Plaintiffs filed a negligence action against defendants for damages resulting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Adams v. SilfenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Knauf v. Dover Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Golden Gas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Niles v. ShinkleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Centric-Jones Co. v. HufnagelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Continental Nat. Bank v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of GoodbinderColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Watered Down Farms v. RoweColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. City of Englewood v. ReffelColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API