Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1988No. CR-86-0319-AP, CR-86-0320-APPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERNANDEZ, Court of Appeals Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to order restitution payments to commence while appellant was incarcerated in the Arizona State Prison. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, the restitution order was proper. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4031.

In two separate indictments, appellant Mark D. Moore was charged with the commission of two first-degree murders, three aggravated assaults, three kidnappings, armed robbery, armed burglary and theft. Five different people were victims of the crimes,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Shenah v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Dupnik v. MacDougallArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Redewill v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State v. StocksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API