Legal Opinion

Marshak v. Fontana

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant on a bank check in the sum of $460 whiek represented the balance due. on a carload of pears purchased by the defendant from the plaintiff. A counterclaim was filed by the defendant alleging that plaintiff orally warranted and represented that said carload of pears was sound and not decayed and were fit for human consumption and that said pears would keep for more than 15 days after the date of purchase. The pleaded facts were sufficiently traversed and damages were alleged in the sum of $800. On these issues the case was submitted to the jury and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. Peoples Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Bigelow v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Windahl v. VanderwiltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Trevisol v. Fresno Fruit Growers Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Black Hawk National Bank v. Monarch Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API