Legal Opinion
Bigelow v. Burnham
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 3, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from Buena Vista District Court. — Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. Action on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
I. Plaintiff sues on a promissory note worded as follows:
“Storm Lake, Buena Vista County, Iowa.
“For value received, I promise to pay Rufas Burnham or bearer eighteen hundred and fifty-eight dollars and sixty-three cents within one year from date, with interest at seven per cent.
“Rollin Burnham.
“May 2, 1885.”
She, in an amended petition, averred that this note was executed in renewal of an indebtedness from defendant to Rufas Burnham for real estate sold by *301the latter to the former, and prayed for the establishment of a vendor’s lien upon the land. The defendant admitted the execution and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bigelow v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- King v. GottschalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Rubey v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Stoddard v. BurtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Hesser v. DoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Baxter T. BeckwithColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Shoemaker v. RaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- United States Savings & Loan Co. v. ShainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- In re the Estate of WearinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.