Legal Opinion

Black Hawk National Bank v. Monarch Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtDe Geaee, C. J.

Two defendants are involved in this action: (1) the Webster City Savings Bank, on a liability predicated on its written guaranty to the plaintiff, securing an obli-gation evidenced by a •negotiable promissory n0^e payable to plaintiff; and (2) the Monarch Company, a corporation, the alleged maker of said note. The record discloses that, subsequently to the entry of judgment, nothing was done by the defendant Webster City Savings Bank except to perfect its appeal to this court. Its appearance is not entered here. No brief points or propositions are made, and no argument has been filed. Under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte Goldberg & LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Jacobus v. . Jamestown Mantel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Bloomingdale v. CushmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Marshak v. FontanaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API