Legal Opinion

Trevisol v. Fresno Fruit Growers Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 17, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grape, J.

-This appeal involves two actions at law which were consolidated for 'the purpose of trial and judgment. The first case noted in the caption, to wit: Trevisol v. Fresno Fruit Growers Co. is an action in attachment. The second case, to wit: Union Nat. Bank of Fresno v. Peoples Nat. Bank of Albia, is an action by the plaintiff as payee to recover the sum of $611.39 from the defendant bank on a sight draft purchased by the plaintiff bank from the Fresno Fruit Growers Company. In this action Trevisol, plaintiff in the former case,- intervened and pleaded substantially the same matters as were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. Peoples Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Tolerton & Stetson Co. v. Anglo-California Bank, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Midwest National Bank & Trust Co. v. Niles & Watters Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Montrose Savings Bank v. ClaussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Commercial Bank v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Dubuque Fruit Co. v. C. C. Emerson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Snyder & Blankfard Co. v. Farmers' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Commercial Investment Corp. v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API