Grimes Savings Bank v. McHarg
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
The trial court, on motion of the plaintiff-bank, at the conclusion of all the testimony, directed a verdict in its favor. Does the evidence bearing on the bona fides of the bank in this transaction warrant a submission of the case to the jury? That is the primary question on the instant appeal, and the answer will be made presently and briefly.
Plaintiff’s petition'is in three counts, which set forth, respectively, three negotiable -promissory notes, alleged to have been executed by the defendant. The first count predicates recovery on a “myself” note of $1,250, dated October 4, 1919, payable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First National Bank of Montour v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- First National Bank v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Commercial Savings Bank v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Second National Bank v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Cedar Point State Bank v. YoutzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Newton National Bank v. Strand Baking Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Strange v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Pierce v. LichtensteinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.