Gibson Properties Co. v. City of Oakland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The following statement of facts upon which this action is based is expressly approved by the appellants, and impliedly by the respondent. We, therefore, accept it as the true factual situation of the parties in this action.
This appeal was taken from a judgment for the defendant in an action at law for damages claimed because of changes in the design and construction of a building made in anticipation that street-opening proceedings, later abandoned, would be carried through to completion.
In March of 1926 the appellant Gibson Properties Company had acquired title to an irregularly shaped…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- City of L.A. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McGee v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Kaufman v. TomichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bould v. TouchetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.