Legal Opinion

United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Emory Eugene Cornog, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 30, 1991No. 89-8264PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:

I

A

On January 5, 1989, a jury convicted Emory Eugene Cornog on one count of conspiring, between January 1987 and February 13, 1988, to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) 1 and 846 (1988) 2 and on two substantive counts of cocaine distribution, on February 9,1988 and February 12,1988, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Following his conviction, Cornog’s probation officer prepared a presentence investigation (PSI) report that assessed his offense level and criminal history score.

To determine Cornog’s criminal history score,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. George Terzado-MadrugaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry Roscoe McGlocklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. ShenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Jesus Vea-GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Robert William JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API