Legal Opinion

Burns v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 13, 1991No. 89-7260PublishedCited by 748 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The question in this case is whether a district court may depart upward from the sentencing range established by the Sentencing Guidelines without first notifying the parties that it intends to depart. We hold that it may not.

I

Petitioner William Burns was employed by the United States Agency for International Development (AID) from 1967 until 1988. Between 1982 and 1988, petitioner used his position as a supervisor in the agency’s Financial Management Section to authorize payment of AID funds into a bank account controlled by him in the name of a fictitious person. During this period, 53…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by748 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

743 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API