Legal Opinion

United States v. Larry Roscoe McGlocklin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1993No. 91-6121PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

We voted to consider this case en banc to decide whether a defendant may challenge at sentencing a prior state court conviction not previously ruled invalid which would result in a longer sentence if included within the sentencing guidelines calculus.1 We conclude that a narrow window of challenge to prior convictions is available, and in this opinion we set forth the considerations that should inform a sentencing court’s disposition of such a challenge. As to defendant McGlock-lin’s sentence, we conclude that on the evidence presented his prior convictions…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Wendell LayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Cecil FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Kevin Eugene WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Lee Erwin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API