Legal Opinion

Peffer v. Federal Cartridge Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1945No. Civil Actions Nos. 580, 569, 570, 601, 603, 638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The particular claimants herein involved are six former employees of the defendant whose claims were instituted in their behalf by Lawrence Peffer in the case of Lawrence Peffer et al. v. Federal Cartridge Corporation — Stanley W. Thiele, A. W. Dur-rin, Irvin P. Erickson, Borg R. Nielson, John Wing, and Warren Dornfeld — and five former employees who brought separate suits against the defendant — Paul J. Tambornino, Eric T. Wick, Anthony M. Fióla, Ray J. Lindquist, and Teddy Webb. These cases have been consolidated for trial.

For the purpose of this proceeding,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Smith v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Phillips v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  4. Drake v. Hercules Powder Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1946
  5. Bernick v. CoddonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API