Legal Opinion

Reed v. Murphey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1948No. 12173PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by 121 named plaintiffs and two interveners against M. T. Reed and - others, a copartnership doing business as M. T. Reed Construction Company, to recover overtime, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees alleged to be due under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 52 Stat. 1069, 29 U.S.C.Á. § 216(b).

The contest stems from work performed by plaintiffs for defendants during the war when defendants were engaged, under two cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contracts with the United States Government, in the original construction, and subsequent…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Empire Gas Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Lassiter v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
  4. Fruco Const. Co. v. McClellandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  5. McDaniel v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API