Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Federal Cartridge Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 8, 1947No. Civil Actions 637, 571, 668PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced these actions to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees and incidental costs, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, hereinafter referred to as the Act.
By answer, defendant claims plaintiffs were employed in bona fide executive, administrative or professional capacities, within the meaning of the Act and defined in regulations issued pursuant thereto. The cases were consolidated for trial.
That the parties were at all times subject to the Act is not disputed. The sole question…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Smith v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
- Distelhorst v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guthrie v. Lady Jane Collieries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Corporation, Joe Harlan v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Tumminello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.