Legal Opinion

Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1945No. 956PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Here, as in Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co., ante, p. 419, we are concerned with the problem of whether a particular type of wage agreement meets the requirements of Section 7 (a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.1

Respondent is a Wisconsin corporation engaged in producing electrical products for interstate commerce. About one-half of respondent’s production employees, called incentive or piece workers, are involved in this case.

As a result of collective bargaining by their union, these employees entered into a collective agreement with respondent whereby they are each paid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1943

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. 149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. AsseltaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Walling v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API