Legal Opinion
Bernick v. Coddon
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 18, 1946No. Civ. No. 678PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Milton Bernick sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., 52 Stat. 1060, for overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees.
It appears from the evidence that plaintiff commenced working for defendants on or about June 15, 1921, and progressed in ability, experience and increased wages as time went on. On October 24, 1938, plaintiff was receiving a weekly wage of $40. Commencing in January, 1939, he was paid $50 per week, to which wa's added a bonus, which made his weekly wages approximately $65. Employees who were called…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- George Lawley & Son Corp. v. SouthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Helliwell v. HabermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Snyder v. WessnerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Piñán v. Mayagüez Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1955
- Abundis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Walling v. Snyder Min. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
- Fox v. Sun Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.