Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. City of Huntington Park
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1939No. Civ. 10934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Two actions were instituted by plaintiffs City of Los Angeles and the Board of Water and Power Commissioners of that city. In one of said actions the City of Huntington Park was the defendant and in the other, the City of South Gate was the defendant. The plaintiffs sought by said actions to have the court determine the terms and conditions under which they might exercise the right, claimed by them under Statutes 1923, chapter 76, to erect and maintain electric power transmission lines through the defendant cities. The two actions were consolidated for trial and resulted in a judgment in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Russell v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Sunny Slope Water Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- City of South Pasadena v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- City of Beverly Hills v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Litmon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- County of Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Horney v. HorneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.