City of Beverly Hills v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, from an order dissolving a restraining order, and from an order denying an injunction pendente lite. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
In this action plaintiff sought a decree perpetually enjoining the city of Los Angeles from laying, constructing, and maintaining a pipe-line over, through, across, and under certain streets of the city of Beverly Hills for the purpose of conveying water from the source of supply thereof to the city of Los Angeles.
The result of the trial was a judgment in favor of defendants and denying plaintiff’s right to an injunction, from which, and an order dissolving a restraining order made upon filing the complaint, and an order denying an injunction pendente lite,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City Railway Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Russell v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by13 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- State of California v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 1941
- PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF OK. v. Caddo Electric Coop.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- City of San Diego v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.