Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1977No. 11874PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of appellant’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant sought damages for wrongful discharge, including loss of wages, retirement benefits, vacation time, general damages for injury to reputation, mental and emotional distress and for compensatory general damages. In her original complaint appellant sought a writ of mandate to afford her a hearing before the Board of Directors of the Irrigation District on her discharge. This was granted, following which a hearing was held…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API