Legal Opinion
Moro v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 2015No. S061452; S061431; S061454; S061475; S061860PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*172BALMER, C. J.
Petitioners are active and retired members of the Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) challenging two legislative amendments aimed at reducing the cost of retirement benefits — Senate Bill (SB) 822 (2013), which eliminated income tax offset benefits for nonresident retirees and modified the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) applied to PERS benefits, and SB 861 (2013), which further modified the PERS COLA. Or Laws 2013, ch 53 (SB 822); Or Laws 2013, ch 2 (Spec Sess) (SB 861). Petitioners raise numerous challenges to the amendments but argue primarily that the amendments impair…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Moyer v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.