Legal Opinion
United States v. Kent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2011No. 10-10011PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on February 8, 2011, and published at 633 F.3d 920, is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 2363 [633 F.3d at 926-27], line 12, delete the first two sen tences of this paragraph, from <The latter > through <462.>.
At slip opinion page 2364 [633 F.3d at 927], line 14, insert a paragraph stating: <Aceordingly, in the context of pretrial plea negotiations, “vindictiveness will not be presumed simply from the fact that a more severe charge followed on, or even resulted from, the defendant’s exercise of a right.” Gamez-Orduno, 235 F.3d at 462.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Esnel IsnadinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ManzoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jayde EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Bud BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Anthony PisarskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.