Legal Opinion
United States v. Esnel Isnadin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 2014No. 12-13474PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCTOR, District Judge:
It has been said the first rule of modern warfare is, “Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.” In this case, an undercover ATF 1 agent made contact with two of the Appellants in this case, Jolens “Blunt” Cius and Kamensky Gustama, and offered them an opportunity to rob a stash house. 2 In doing so, the agent made clear that those who guarded the controlled substances were armed. Therefore, when Cius and Gustama explored alternative approaches to an armed robbery, the agent offered a similar warning about the need for weapons: “You got to [expletive deleted] rob them,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Sherond Duron KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BastonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. James DixonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Demetrius Renaldo BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Wenxia ManCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.