Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Navarro-Botello

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1990No. 89-50221PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this case is whether a defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal a sentence as part of a negotiated plea agreement violates due process or public policy. We hold that if the waiver is made voluntarily and knowingly, it is enforceable and does not violate due process or public policy. Accordingly, because appellant Jose Navarro-Botello voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to appeal his sentence as part of his plea agreement, his waiver is enforceable. Therefore, we affirm the district court.

I. Facts

On September 15, 1988, Navarro-Botello drove to the San…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Michael Nguyen, AKA Viet Quoc NguyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. James BushertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API