Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Pisarski
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2020No. 17-10428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10428 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 3:14-cr-00278-RS-1 3:14-cr-00278-RS-2 ANTHONY PISARSKI; SONNY 3:14-cr-00278-RS MOORE, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 3, 2019 San Diego, California Filed July 10, 2020 Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Eugene E. Siler, * and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge McKeown; Dissent by Judge…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Cameron CannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Hello Farms Licensing MI, LLC v. GR Vending MI, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
- United States v. Cameron CannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022