Legal Opinion

Bursey v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 2004No. 3813PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”) and the South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (“SCE & G”) appeal a Circuit Court order affirming the decision of the South Carolina Mining Council. The Mining Council, deciding an appeal of a DHEC determination that SCE & G would not be required to obtain a mining permit in connection with its Lake Murray Dam remediation project (also referred to in various documents and briefs as the Saluda River Dam remediation project), ruled that SCE & G was required to obtain a mining permit. We affirm.1

FACTUAL/PROCE…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Grant v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Fontaine v. PeitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Bass v. Kenco GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Bursey v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API