Legal Opinion

Grant v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 21, 1995No. 24302PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This is an appeal of a circuit court’s affirmance of a ruling by the South Carolina Coastal Council (Coastal Council) that the Appellant, J. Kirkland Grant (Grant), violated S.C. Code Ann. § 48-39-130(0 by filling critical area tidelands without a permit. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1987, Grant purchased approximately ten acres of land on Folly Beach, South Carolina, in the area on the northern side of Ashley Avenue locally known as the “washout area.” He built a small single-family residence on the property. The balance of the property consisted of a dune field along the frontage of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Carter v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Burgess v. SternSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Hill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Town of Hollywood v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  5. DuRant v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API