Legal Opinion
Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 1, 2002No. 3470PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, claimant Sandra Ether-edge appeals the Circuit Court’s denial of her claim for benefits. Etheredge argues the Circuit Court erred in finding she did not provide her employer with timely notice of her injury pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 42-15-20. We reverse.
FACTSIPROCEDURAL HISTORY
Etheredge began working with Monsanto Company/Solutia (“Solutia”) in 1996 as a draw/twist operator. In 1997, she was reassigned as a draw/wind operator, where she worked for the remainder of her employment with Solutia and where she contends her medical problems started.
On August 4,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Frame v. Resort Services Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.