Legal Opinion
Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 21, 1999No. 3012PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
Dale Muir brought this Workers’ Compensation action alleging he contracted hepatitis C, aplastic anemia and myelodysplasia as a result of examining used foley catheters in his employment with C.R. Bard, Inc. (Bard). The Single Commissioner found Muir’s illnesses compensable as occupational diseases. In addition, the Single Commissioner refused to allow Bard a credit for payments of short term and long term disability. The Full Commission and the Circuit Court affirmed. Bard appeals. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Single Commissioner, Full Commission, and Circuit…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. DriverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Frame v. Resort Services Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.