Legal Opinion

People v. Gianni

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1933No. Docket No. 4754PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an action in eminent domain. The state seeks to take a small portion of appellant's land. The area of the portion sought is .21 of an acre. This small portion forms a part of a larger tract owned by appellant and of a total area of approximately sixty-three acres. Judgment and final order of condemnation was entered and the value of the property taken was fixed at $10.50 and the court found and decreed that the damage accruing to the balance of the land by reason of the portion taken was and is the sum of no dollars. The appeal is prosecuted by defendant Gianni.

Neit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Levee Dist. No. 9 v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wolff v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API