Legal Opinion

Wolff v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1920No. Civ. No. 3450, Civ. No. 3451, Civ. No. 3452PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The plaintiffs in these three cases appeal from several judgments rendered against them upon nonsuits granted on motion of the respondent municipality. The cases were consolidated for the purpose of the respective appeals, it being stipulated that the judgment in the Wolff case should control the determination of the other two appeals. The plaintiffs as owners of their respective lots of land sued for damages for injuries claimed to have been suffered by them by reason of the depreciation of the values of their lands caused, as they alleged, by the opening of North Broadway tunnel and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. City of Stockton v. MarengoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API