Legal Opinion

People v. Symons

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1960No. L. A. 25999PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Defendants Francis G. Symons and Helen P. Symons appeal from a judgment determining and limiting severance damages in eminent domain proceedings for the partial taking of the defendants’ residential property in the city of Los Angeles for the development of streets adjacent to a state freeway. Amici curiae briefs in support of the judgment have been filed by the attorney general, the county counsels of San Diego, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, and by the city attorney of the city of Los Angeles.

The defendants’ property consisted of a single family home on a residential lot on the south side…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API