Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1950No. 32684PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In this case it appears that on the 7th day of December, 1940, Charles O. Armstrong, appellant herein, was adjudged an incompetent by the county court of Kay county, and O. B. Martin was appointed guardian of his person and estate.

Prior to the time appellant was adjudged incompetent, he and his mother, Amanda J. Armstrong, were the owners of 160 acres of land located in Kay county, Oklahoma, each owning a one-half interest therein. Thirteen acres of the land was situated on the east side of Highway No. 77, the balance on the west side. This land they thereafter traded to John W. Dyckes for an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. In Re Mize's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. In Re Estate of Wah-Kon-Tah-He-Ump-AhSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. HatcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Louise Heldenbrand and O. J. Heldenbrand v. Bloise Stevenson, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Oscar Stevenson, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Blancett v. EslingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Clark v. KinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API