Legal Opinion

Warren v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 2012No. 107,292PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

T1 The issues before us are: (1) Does a District Court in a guardianship proceeding have jurisdiction to approve a contingent fee agreement made by a guardian on behalf of a ward; (2) May a court in a guardianship proceeding decline to approve a contingent fee agreement for payment of a lawyer's services provided to the ward merely because payments pursuant to that agreement were made prior to court approval being sought; and (8) May a court in an open and continuing guardianship proceeding deny a motion to approve a contingent fee contract merely because of the length of time between…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Marley v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Evers v. FSF Overlake AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Vance v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API