Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Wah-Kon-Tah-He-Ump-Ah

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 13, 1927No. 17518PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment for attorney's fees allowed to A. B. Burris, defendant in error, for representing the executor named in a will in resisting in a contest against the probate of such will.

As the court made a finding of all facts material to the issues in the case and upon such finding based his judgment, we adopt the court's finding, which is as follows:

"To wit on the ___ day of _____ Wah-kon-tah-he-um-pah, Osage allottee No. 482, died in Osage county, leaving a last will and testament in which she constituted A. A. Exendine as her executor; that the said A. A. Exendine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gow v. MauryMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Needham v. NeedhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wise v. CutchallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Nichols v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Matter of Estate of WestfahlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Armstrong v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API