In Re Estate of Wah-Kon-Tah-He-Ump-Ah
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment for attorney's fees allowed to A. B. Burris, defendant in error, for representing the executor named in a will in resisting in a contest against the probate of such will.
As the court made a finding of all facts material to the issues in the case and upon such finding based his judgment, we adopt the court's finding, which is as follows:
"To wit on the ___ day of _____ Wah-kon-tah-he-um-pah, Osage allottee No. 482, died in Osage county, leaving a last will and testament in which she constituted A. A. Exendine as her executor; that the said A. A. Exendine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gow v. MauryMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Needham v. NeedhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by13 opinions
- Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Wise v. CutchallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Nichols v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Matter of Estate of WestfahlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Armstrong v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.