Holmes v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; A. E. Huston, Judge. Action by John Holmes and others against Lnella Holmes. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Citing Betts et al. v. Mills, 8 Olda. 351. Citing: Fare v. Fore, 2 N. D. 260; Weaver v. Bank (Kan.) 94 Pae. 273; Funk v. Baker, 21 Olda. 402.
1Opinion of the Court
"HAYES, J.
Plaintiffs in error, who originally brought this action in the district court of Kingfisher county, sdek by it to obtain a decree adjudging them, as the heirs of Edwin M. Holmes, deceased, to be each the owner of an undivided one-fourteenth interest in 80 acres of land situated in Kingfisher county, and granting them a partition thereof. The judgment of the trial court was against them and dismissed their petition. Judgment was rendered upon the pleadings without the introduction of any evidence.
It is not necessary to set out the pleadings in full, and only such parts will be stated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Railroad Companies v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Kane v. McCownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Cross v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Weaver v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Wilkinson v. MerrillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. MotesenbockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Matter of Estate of FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.