Legal Opinion

Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-op

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2013No. S-12-403PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets HOLDSWORTH v. GREENWOOD FARMERS CO-OP 49 Cite as

286 Neb. 49

interlock revocation. The sentence and sanctions imposed were not an abuse of discretion. Therefore, we affirm. Affirmed. Bruce Holdsworth, appellee, v. Greenwood Farmers Cooperative and Cooperative Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., appellants. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 14, 2013. No. S-12-403. 1. Workers’ Compensation: Appeal and Error. An appellate court is obligated in workers’ compensation cases to make its own determinations as to questions of law. 2. Jurisdiction. A jurisdictional question which does not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dada v. MukaseySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Currie Ex Rel. Currie v. Chief School Bus Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Foote v. O'Neill PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Brothers v. Kimball Cty. Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Woodmen of the World v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Interiano-Lopez v. Tyson Fresh MeatsNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. SikesNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API