Legal Opinion

O'CONNOR v. Kaufman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1998No. S-97-860PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.

The question in this case is whether an order sustaining a motion for partial summary judgment, which grants a permanent injunction but reserves the issue of monetary damages for later disposition, is a final, appealable order pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1902 (Reissue 1995).

Evelyn A. O’Connor initially filed suit in Scotts Bluff County District Court, alleging ownership of an implied easement for the use of a water well located on David A. Kaufman and Virginia L. Kaufman’s property. The Kaufmans responded by filing a motion for summary judgment, which the district court sustained.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of RGNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jarrett v. EichlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. JacquesNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rohde v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Currie Ex Rel. Currie v. Chief School Bus Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re Interest of Noah B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In Re Interest of Mainor T.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API