Legal Opinion
Brothers v. Kimball Cty. Hosp.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 2015No. S-13-725PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets BROTHERS v. KIMBALL CTY. HOSP. 879 Cite as
289 Neb. 879
to attorney fees or the issues raised in the cross-appeals of Frederick and Falls City. An appellate court is not obligated to engage in an analysis that is not necessary to adjudicate the case and controversy before it.33 V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we vacate and reverse the writ of mandamus and the order awarding attorney fees to Frederick, and we remand the cause to the district court with directions to dismiss. Vacated and reversed, and remanded with directions. 33 Conroy v. Keith Cty. Bd. of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Woodard v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- DMK Biodiesel v. McCoyNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Willis v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Estate of ClingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Johnson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Hill v. AMMC, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Litherland v. JurgensNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- D.M. v. StateNebraska Court of Appeals · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.