Armstrong v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets ARMSTRONG v. STATE 205 Cite as
290 Neb. 205
did not witness the incident. Neither the State nor the defense presented additional evidence on this issue. Without any other evidence to rely on, the district court found Cronin’s testimony to be more credible than Wells’ tes- timony. We are not in a position to reweigh the credibility of the witnesses. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the pros- ecution, which in this case would mean assuming Cronin’s account of the incident is correct, there was sufficient evidence to find all essential elements of the crime…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Kimminau v. Uribe Refuse Service & EMC InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gardner v. International Paper Destr. & Recycl.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. BH Media Group v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Bower v. Eaton Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Krause v. Five Star Quality Care, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Krause v. Five Star Quality CareNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.