Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2015No. S-14-438PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets ARMSTRONG v. STATE 205 Cite as

290 Neb. 205

did not witness the incident. Neither the State nor the defense presented additional evidence on this issue. Without any other evidence to rely on, the district court found Cronin’s testimony to be more credible than Wells’ tes- timony. We are not in a position to reweigh the credibility of the witnesses. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the pros- ecution, which in this case would mean assuming Cronin’s account of the incident is correct, there was sufficient evidence to find all essential elements of the crime…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kimminau v. Uribe Refuse Service & EMC InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gardner v. International Paper Destr. & Recycl.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. BH Media Group v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Bower v. Eaton Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Krause v. Five Star Quality Care, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Krause v. Five Star Quality CareNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API