State v. Sikes

Nebraska Advance Sheets 38 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS As such, the guaranty was complete, and by its terms, it was enforceable against Sears as to all amounts that the court found owing from Hungry’s to Braunger Foods. CONCLUSION We conclude that the Court of Appeals erred when it deter­ mined that the guaranty was not enforceable against Sears and when it therefore affirmed the district court’s order. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the cause to the Court of Appeals with directions to reverse the decision of the district court as it pertains to Sears’ guaranty and to…